"Parliamentary procedure" is a term many believe limited to student government associations. However, active participants in state education associations cannot afford to be ignorant of parliamentary procedure basics. Courts have held that all organizations, including business, professional, educational, and governmental, are subject to the principles and rules of common parliamentary law.
In addition, many associations adopt language in their rules that they will follow a particular parliamentary procedure book, such as Robert's Rules of Order. Courts have ruled that groups that do not obey the rules or act contrary to the rules they have themselves adopted are liable for their actions. As a result, ignoring or incorrectly applying parliamentary procedure can lead to embarrassment as well as lawsuits.
The benefits of a meeting run according to parliamentary procedure extend beyond questions of liability. A presiding officer who properly applies parliamentary procedure can turn long, confrontational meetings into short, painless ones. By strictly adhering to parliamentary procedure, meetings can progress smoothly and quickly.
What is parliamentary procedure?
Parliamentary procedure is the means by which organizations make decisions. Stated another way, parliamentary procedure is all of the laws and rules of organizations that govern the transaction of business. Demeter's Manual of Parliamentary Law and Procedure states that parliamentary law is the:
rules, laws, or regulations of organizations, governing the orderly, expeditious and efficient transaction of business and meetings and conventions. Without rules, there would be injustice and confusion. Hence, it is as necessary to follow the rules of parliamentary law as it is to follow the rules of a ball game or a card game.
Demeter's, p. 4. Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, another parliamentary manual, defines parliamentary law as follows:
The application of parliamentary law is the best method yet devised to enable assemblies of any size, with due regard for every member's opinion, to arrive at the general will on the maximum number of questions of varying complexity in a minimum amount of time and under all kinds of internal climate ranging from total harmony to hardened or impassioned division of opinion. RONR (10th Edition), p. lii.
Contrary to common perception, parliamentary procedure is not synonymous with the book Robert's Rules of Order (11th Edition)("RONR"). Instead, there are several major parliamentary books, with RONR being the most popular (used by approximately 85% of U.S. organizations). Another well-known parliamentary authority is Sturgis Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure, used by approximately 10% of organizations (and a much easier book from which to learn parliamentary procedure). There are other excellent manuals of parliamentary procedure available. However, the fact that RONR is the most widely used book as well as the easiest to locate argues in its favor as a parliamentary authority.
RONR is an excellent resource for association leaders. The book includes sections on presiding, the duties of officers, running elections, making proper motions, and holding board and committee meetings. RONR is fairly easy to find--just be sure to buy the right book. There are numerous RONR "clones" and earlier editions that are easy to get by mistake. RONR is available in both hardback and softcover (and is 716 pages long).
What prodecures must associations follow?
Most associations formally adopt written rules of parliamentary procedure. This can be accomplished by adopting a rule (typically in the constitution or bylaws) that a particular book shall be the parliamentary authority. The procedural rules in that book then govern meetings when not inconsistent with higher authority, such as state or federal law. This parliamentary authority can be supplemented with more detailed rules for specific situations.
Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) is the official parliamentary authority of the National Education Association (NEA Bylaws § 13-1). Furthermore, the NEA Bylaws require affiliates to adopt a published parliamentary authority.
The conduct of business in an assembly often varies by size. Annual meetings such as state conventions or representative assemblies (RA's) are typically formal in procedure. Business conducted in a board of more than a dozen members follows the same formal procedure. Some characteristics of formal parliamentary procedure are as follows:
In contrast, formal procedure in a meeting of fewer than a dozen may actually hinder business. RONR § 49 recommends that the procedure in smaller boards be less formal, such that:
While smaller boards can operate more informally, there are times that more formal procedure may be warranted. If a particular issue is hotly contested or likely to subject the board to publicity or a lawsuit, more formal procedure can ensure that procedural safeguards have been observed.
What is the standard order of business for board meetings?
The "order of business" is the sequence in which business is taken up during a meeting. It is a blueprint for meetings and provides a systematic plan for the orderly conduct of business.
If the rules of procedure do not include a standard order of business, parliamentary law has established the following pattern for board of directors (or governing board) meetings:
Opening the meeting
Approval of minutes
Reports of officers, boards, and standing committees
Reports are generally for information only. In such instances, no motion is necessary following the reports unless there are recommendations to be implemented. A motion "to adopt" or "to accept" a report is seldom wise except when the report is to be issued or published in the name of the organization.
On the other hand, it is common that the reporting member end by making a motion if there is a specific recommendation for action. For example, the budget committee may have studied the current dues structure. In her report, the committee chairman might thank the members of the committee for their hard work and explain in detail the committee’s position and reasoning. At the end of her report, the committee chair would close by saying, "On behalf of the committee, I move that annual dues be increased to $25.00."
Reports of special committees
The presiding officer should know if there are any items to be considered under unfinished business. As a result, the presiding officer should not ask, "Is there any unfinished business?" Instead, the presiding officer should simply state the question on the first item of business. If there is no unfinished business, the presiding officer should skip this category of business.
The presiding officer introduces the heading of new business by asking, "Is there any new business?" Any member can then introduce new items of business by making a motion and obtaining a second. Following the consideration of each item, the chair repeatedly asks, "Is there any further new business?" This process continues until there are no additional business items to come before the assembly.
Closing the meeting
If custom or tradition require that a motion to adjourn be made, the presiding officer can ask, "Is there a motion to adjourn?" Once the motion is made and seconded, the presiding officer can ask, "Is there any objection to adjourning the meeting? Hearing no objection, the meeting is adjourned."
What is the standard order of business for annual meetings or conventions?
Unlike a board, an annual convention or representative assembly (RA) meets less frequently. While the order of business for a convention is in many ways similar to that listed above for boards (simply spread over more time), there are a few significant differences:
Approval of minutes
Adoption of convention committee reports
The official organization of a convention is brought about by the separate consideration and adoption of three committee reports: Credentials, Standing Rules, and Program, in that order. No activities other than preliminary ceremonies (invocation, pledge, introductions) should be transacted before the adoption of these three reports.
How is business brought before the assembly?
A "motion" is a formal statement of a proposal or question to an assembly for consideration and action.
A motion is brought before the assembly with three steps:
1. A member makes the motion.
("I move that...")
2. Another member seconds the motion.
Seconder does not need to be recognized.
3. The chair states the question.
"It is moved and seconded that (or to)..."
Once properly before the assembly, a motion is considered in three steps:
1. Members debate the motion (unless undebatable)
Preference in recognition:
1. Member who made motion
2. Member who has not yet spoken a first time
3. If possible, alternate for and against
2. Chair puts question to a vote
"The question is on the adoption of..."
"As many as are in favor of the motion, say aye."
"Those opposed, say no."
"Those in favor of the motion will rise [or "stand"]. Be seated."
"Those opposed will rise [or "stand"]. Be seated."
3. Chair announces result of vote
"The ayes have it and the motion is adopted." (or)
"The noes have it and the motion is lost."
"The affirmative has it and the motion is adopted." (or)
"The negative has it and the motion is lost."
How do motions work together?
Many specific motions such as amend, recess, and adjourn have become defined under parliamentary law. For convenience and description, these various motions may be classified into five broad categories:
A main motion brings business before the assembly. It can only be made when no other motion is pending and ranks lowest in the order of precedence of motions.
Subsidiary motions assist the assembly in considering or disposing of a main motion (and sometimes other motions). Subsidiary motions fall into the order of precedence.
Privileged motions do not relate to the pending business, but have to do with special matters of immediate and overriding importance which, without debate, should be allowed to interrupt the consideration of anything else. Privileged motions fit into an order of precedence.
Incidental motions deal with questions of procedure arising out of other motions or business. They have no order of precedence among themselves. Instead, they arise incidentally and are decided as they arise.
Motions that bring a question again before the assembly
These motions do not quite fit in any other category and rarely arise. They do not fit within the order of precedence and can only be made while no business is pending.
Not every motion is in order at any time. Motions are proposed, considered, and disposed of in an order known as "precedence." Assigning a rank or order to each commonly used motion enables an assembly to consider each motion without confusion. The order of precedence from highest ranking to lowest ranking is as follows:
Privileged Motions (Highest Rank)
3. Question of privilege
4. Lay on the table
5. Previous question (end debate)
6. Limit or extend debate
7. Postpone to a certain time (or "postpone" definitely)
8. Commit or refer (to committee)
Main Motion (Lowest Rank)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Precedence can be defined with two basic rules:
1. When a motion is being considered, any motion higher on the list of precedence may be proposed, but no motion lower on the list may be proposed.
2. Motions are considered and voted on in reverse of their proposal. The motion last proposed (and highest on the list) is considered and disposed of first.
What are the principles of parliamentary procedure?
As with any area of the law, a little knowledge of parliamentary procedure is often a dangerous thing. Some people view parliamentary law as something to be learned so that they can manipulate the rules to their advantage. However, any intent in using parliamentary procedure that is other than constructive, such as to confuse or confound, is an abuse of rules. "The purpose of parliamentary procedure is to facilitate the transaction of business and to promote cooperation and harmony." Sturgis, p. 7.
Since rules cannot apply to every situation, recourse to the fundamental principles of parliamentary law as stated by Sturgis may be necessary:
Jim Slaughter is an attorney, Certified Professional Parliamentarian, Professional Registered Parliamentarian, and past President of the American College of Parliamentary Lawyers. He is author of The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Parliamentary Procedure Fast-Track and lead author of Notes and Comments on Robert’s Rules, Fourth Edition.
Charts and articles are intended to provide general information on parliamentary procedure and are not legal advice or a legal opinion.